Even with my current job as a systems analyst, a software developer/programmer, I felt a need to document my learning, so I have something to always look back to, especially with my advancing age. But no, I'm not that old yet...
Third generation Amazon Kindle, showing text from the novel Moby-Dick. Esperanto: Amazon Kindle de la tria generacio, montranta originan tekston el la romano Moby-Dick. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
17-Jan-2013
For sometime now, I have been downloading e-books from one site that has continued to supply the materials on a regular basis. So if you are hunting for an e-book source, here it is:
English: Change Management's Proposal flow Italiano: Change Management,flusso delle fase di proposta della RFC (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
11-Jan-2013
I am gathering all my wits to put this article up, as it means a total recall for me. I mean, from this moment forward, I would have to do my best to bring to mind the struggle and the pain, the obstacles and difficulties that I faced, and how I searched and sifted through the web articles that I found, tried and tested, and finally, to get a working model, fully functional, complete to the last letter of the specifications, and with some extra thrown in at that!
To begin with, let me list down the sections needed for the Automated Change Request System:
The home or default page, is where any user, especially new, can get to know what this automated change management system is all about. This page also enumerates those data fields that are opened up for self-management by those data owners, like Qual engineers, Customer Service personnel, ProductEngineers, etc., etc.
A simple process flow for the AutoCR is also included, so the user knows how the process works.
Our hotline, to be called if there is any issue or query, is put in as well. Now I say this is a must!
And finally, a note at the bottom of the list of updatable items points out the fact that anything not in the list will go through the normal change management – this is where we have our say to accept or reject.
That’s all for now. I will keep my posts short and (quickly) readable.
Till then!
-----
Next: The Form for updating Manufacturing Device data
While there are hypes about making money online, and there are so many 'gurus' as they would call themselves that, the truth can never be known from simply listening to these guys.
I'm years now into blogging, and I was once enamored by this enticing possibility. Why not? It is free, and all you have to do is blog your heart out. It's what we'd usually call enjoying what you like doing, and earning from it at the same time.
All that easy, right?
Wrong!
when these gurus talk, it is most probably that they are talking about something that is true. They show you their money. They show your their car. They show you their house (mansion, to be more precise). They show you many things that makes you drool, and say to yourself, "I want what this guy has."
Enticement. That is the whole truth of it. They speak only half the truth. That's where the danger lies.
You see, if you are working hard, and at the end of the day, the money you hold in your hand is what you'd call the produce of your hard work, your sweat and blood, your hard-earned money, would you part with it that easily? Would you think twice if you were to put it in some mysteriously high-paying plan, the source of which you wouldn't know, or couldn't even understand?
That's the whole truth of it. Making Money Online is:
1. Hard Work
2. Takes Time
3. Can't be through AdSense alone
4. Can't be through Affiliate Marketing alone
5. All the other hypes that you'd usually hear from 'multi-millionaire gurus'....
You earn when you sell. So basically, Making Money Online is about selling. And you don't sell crap to people, mind you. Don't be like those scammers and fraudsters who make money online by cheating you with your eyes open!
So please, making money online is not something mysterious. You want to earn, sell. And it has to be a legit product. It has to add value to your customers. It has to be a product of value and quality. Not hype. Not scam.
After getting w.bloggar a good start - installation, configuration, etc. - it is sad to say that this promising free software falls short of its promise. This is to say the least for blogger users.
What's the problem?
There is no title bar.
It is a house without a roof, a body without a head, an iceberg that has no tip...
SAN FRANCISCO - Microsoft on Thursday said regulatory wrangling has prompted it to strip Internet Explorer Web browsers from copies of its Windows 7 operating system to be sold in Europe.
The US software giant said it still plans to release its next-generation operating system worldwide on October 22, but that customers in Europe will have to install Web browsers of their choice.
"We're committed to making Windows 7 available in Europe at the same time that it launches in the rest of the world, but we also must comply with European competition law as we launch the product," Microsoft deputy general counsel Dave Heiner said in a written release.
"Given the pending legal proceeding, we've decided that instead of including Internet Explorer in Windows 7 in Europe, we will offer it separately and on an easy-to-install basis to both computer manufacturers and users."
Microsoft announced the development this week so computer makers can adapt to having to install Web browsers in new machines running on the US software giant's new operating system, according to Heiner.
"We're committed to launching Windows 7 on time in Europe, so we need to address the legal realities in Europe, including the risk of large fines," Heiner said.
"We believe that this new approach, while not our first choice, is the best path forward given the ongoing legal case in Europe."
Microsoft is defending itself in the European Union against accusations of unfairly crushing rivals in the Web browser market.
The European Commission, Europe's top competition watchdog, opened a new front in its epic antitrust battle with Microsoft in January, hitting the company with fresh charges of unfairly squashing competition.
The commission on Thursday expressed skepticism over the Microsoft move and said it will decide soon whether it believes the software powerhouse has abused its dominant position in the market and what remedies are needed.
"In terms of potential remedies, if the Commission were to find that Microsoft had committed an abuse, the Commission has suggested that consumers should be offered a choice of browser not that Windows should be supplied without a browser at all," it said in a statement.
Microsoft is to defend itself at a hearing, which companies are allowed to do under EU antitrust rules.
If Microsoft fails to beat back the charges, the commission could slap the company with huge new fines and order it to change its ways.
The commission accuses Microsoft of crushing rivals by bundling IE into its ubiquitous Windows personal computer operating system, giving the program an unfair advantage over competitors' browsers.
Heiner said Microsoft expects that stripping IE from Windows 7 will bolster its position that it is not bundling software in order to suffocate competition.
"We will continue to discuss browser issues and other matters with the Commission," Heiner said.
"We know we need to have a clear plan in place to address the 'bundling' issue in Europe because, at the end of the day, the obligation to comply with European competition law belongs to Microsoft alone."
Microsoft appears to be striving to clear away obstacles to the adoption of Windows 7, according to analyst Michael Cherry of Directions On Microsoft, a private firm that tracks the Redmond, Washington, colossus.
The operating system's predecessor, Vista, has gotten ongoing criticism and been shunned by many computer users. Microsoft wants Windows 7 to be embraced worldwide.
In what could be a competitive opportunity for Google, the decision to ship Windows 7 without IE frees computer manufacturers to make deals to pre-install other browsers such as the US Internet titan's Chrome.
"Getting into an (original equipment manufacturer) build is a pay-for-position kind of thing," Cherry said of the industry practice regarding software pre-loaded on new computers.
"Do any other browser manufacturers have that kind of money to spend in that way? Google has a browser, Chrome, and has money." - AFP/sh